Following feedback from visitors, we've decided to allow Anonymous comments once more. Please be sensible with this: use the Name/URL option rather than posting completely Anonymous comments, and be consistent so that others can follow the trail of comments that you leave.
Also, comments are permitted without moderation, but if this is abused, all comments will have to be moderated before being published, which will delay adding your comment to the website.
Note: if you're having trouble locating the comments, just click on the Title of the blog post. This will show you the entry followed by comments, as well as a text box to post your own comment.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
St Joseph's Primary School Proposed Move - Open meeting
An Open Discussion Meeting for all Stake Holders including Parents and Carers of Current and Future Pupils, Parishioners and Local Residents.
New Urgent Information has become available regarding the City Council’s Proposal for New Schools in West End.
Time to Reflect and Question, at:
New Urgent Information has become available regarding the City Council’s Proposal for New Schools in West End.
Time to Reflect and Question, at:
3 p.m.,
SUNDAY APRIL 19
CLUB ROMANO
16 West Wynd, Dundee (Off Perth Road)
SUNDAY APRIL 19
CLUB ROMANO
16 West Wynd, Dundee (Off Perth Road)
Website reopened for discussion
The Council's public consulation period ended last week on 6 April 2009. We hope that you were able to make written representation to the Project Director, Gillian Ross Pond, in time for the deadline.
We have been advised that the Director of Education will now review all the representations and write a report to go before the Education Committee to consider whether to accept or reject the proposal. All 29 local Councillors will be involved in this decision so it is important that you let your local councillor know your views and if you have any concerns.
We are advised that the date of this event has yet to be confirmed, but it may be near the end of this month. We are therefore reopening this website for comments and open discussion.
In order to ensure clarity in the discussion, comments can only be posted if you have signed up to one of several online systems. Although you can no longer post Anonymous comments, you can sign up to one of these systems using whichever nom-de-plume you wish (as long as it complies with the system's terms and conditions). This should make it easier to follow discussions.
We have been advised that the Director of Education will now review all the representations and write a report to go before the Education Committee to consider whether to accept or reject the proposal. All 29 local Councillors will be involved in this decision so it is important that you let your local councillor know your views and if you have any concerns.
We are advised that the date of this event has yet to be confirmed, but it may be near the end of this month. We are therefore reopening this website for comments and open discussion.
In order to ensure clarity in the discussion, comments can only be posted if you have signed up to one of several online systems. Although you can no longer post Anonymous comments, you can sign up to one of these systems using whichever nom-de-plume you wish (as long as it complies with the system's terms and conditions). This should make it easier to follow discussions.
Labels:
anonymous,
comments,
councillor,
Dundee,
school
Sunday, April 5, 2009
No more comments
The end of the public consultation is almost upon us and we have decided that no further comments should be posted to the blog.
Many thanks to everyone who has contributed to the debate thus far. We hope that you have found the information and discussion useful and interesting.
Please remember to submit your written representation to Gillian Ross Pond by 6 April 2009, whether you are in favour of the proposal as it is, or if you have questions and concerns.
Many thanks to everyone who has contributed to the debate thus far. We hope that you have found the information and discussion useful and interesting.
Please remember to submit your written representation to Gillian Ross Pond by 6 April 2009, whether you are in favour of the proposal as it is, or if you have questions and concerns.
Labels:
comments
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Press coverage and access to our document
The Evening Telegraph has published articles in recent days covering the Council's proposal to build new schools on the Logie site and has today printed a letter from Will K. Laing.
The original article from 31 Mar doesn't appear to be online but our response is here:
They have also printed a letter from Will K. Laing in favour of the proposal as it stands:
Note: if you know anyone who is interested in reading the document but doesn't have internet access and did not collect one of the handouts, perhaps you could print a copy for them or direct them to a public library?
Labels:
council,
Dundee,
Evening Telegraph,
media,
newspaper
Write to Gillian Ross Pond by 6 April 2009
This blog site was started with the aims of:
- distributing information gathered by parents
- encouraging open debate and questioning of the proposal
- countering some misleading arguments that were being put forward
- and leading hopefully to a better informed outcome
We hope it is achieving these aims.
We hope that as many stakeholders as possible will write to Gillian Ross Pond, irrespective of their views on the proposal. We believe that the Council can only be helped in its decision-making by more people contributing to the consultation process. Whatever the Council decides, let's urge them to ensure that St Joseph's, Park Place and Park Place Nursery get the investment they deserve.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Article in the Evening Telegraph 31 March 2009
The Dundee Evening Telegraph has published an article in yesterday's edition (31 March 2009, p10) with quotes from the website and comment from representatives of Dundee City Council, the Bishop of Dunkeld and Councillor Fraser Macpherson.
The West End Parents group did not contact the Evening Telegraph to request this publication.
Whilst we acknowledge the additional publicity this article generates, it would appear that our aims may have been misunderstood. The article states:
1. "Parents opposed to a new shared primary school campus in Dundee's West End..."
The West End Parents group did not contact the Evening Telegraph to request this publication.
Whilst we acknowledge the additional publicity this article generates, it would appear that our aims may have been misunderstood. The article states:
1. "Parents opposed to a new shared primary school campus in Dundee's West End..."
- The West End Parents are not opposed to a new school, nor to a shared campus: we simply have some serious concerns about the size and suitability of the proposed site for bring two primary and one nursery school together.
- Nowhere on the website do we make this claim. The statement, as written by the Tele, is self-evident but our Questions and Concerns document does not make any "danger claims", we are simply asking the Council to check whether sex offenders and drug addicts are in the vicinity of the proposed site. This is not intended to be scaremongering: the question was posed to the Director of Education at one of the consultation meetings and he has promised to investigate this with the Police.
- No allegations have been made. We have only posed the question, asking for information regarding the truth from the Council. Our sources have asked to remain anonymous (for obvious reasons) and we have asked the Council to check. Time is running out for the consultation process and we felt there was no alternative choice but to include these questions on the public website. If the claims are untrue, please let us know. What do local residents think?
- Yes, this is a fact. However, we did not intend this to be social commentary on the type of residents of tenement housing. Many of us, like the concerned commenter last night, live or have lived in tenement housing. The point is there are multiple residences overlooking the play areas of the new site. The current site for St Joseph's does not have this concern and Park Place is only partially overlooked.
- Please, please read the cited references and make up your own mind. If there are other relevant documents, please provide citations for these in the related blog post. We have made these claims based on the regulations that we have identified, either within the group or following discussion with the appropriate Council or Government body.
- When asked about this at consultation meetings, the Director of Education responded that there are "special privileges" that can be dispensed by the Government for sites such as this in an "inner site environment".
- The School Premises Regulations (Scotland) 1967 as amended in 1973 and 79 do indeed include clauses such as 7(6):
Where the Secretary of State is satisfied that it is impracticable or would be unreasonable to apply the standards prescribed in this regulation to a particular school building. the area of the site for that school building shall be such as may be approved.
- However, is this what we aspire to for the children in a new build?
- Our Questions and Concerns document is not a religious document. While we anticipate that some parents from St Joseph's school and parishioners from the adjacent church may have concerns in regard to the proposals, we represent the views of a group that have questions and concerns about the size and suitability of the new site.
- This is untrue in the case of Park Place Primary, Park Place Nursery and St Joseph's Primary schools: the Council's roll projections (section 4.3) indicate anticipated growth - 436 pupils for 2008/09, 445 for 2011/12.
- At consultation meetings, the Director of Education also stated that there is an expectation that rolls for Park Place Nursery will rise by 20-40 places.
- Yes, please do make your views known to the Council, but only after you have been able to make an informed decision. If you have any questions, contribute to the discussion on this website, or call Ms Ross Pond on 01382 435161.
Labels:
Evening Telegraph,
media,
misunderstanding,
newspaper,
scaremongering
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)